<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheap Mic Shootout #1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/</link>
	<description>E-zine dedicated to sound, recording and gear.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:14:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 04:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-398</guid>
		<description>Im just curious why you would reposition the mics each time Jon. Wouldn&#039;t it be easier to hear the difference of each mic if they were placed in precisely the same spot? More accurate maybe? Also, everyone should have a 57.  You can use them for all kinds of stuff... like clubbing baby seals... oh and recording stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im just curious why you would reposition the mics each time Jon. Wouldn&#8217;t it be easier to hear the difference of each mic if they were placed in precisely the same spot? More accurate maybe? Also, everyone should have a 57.  You can use them for all kinds of stuff&#8230; like clubbing baby seals&#8230; oh and recording stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sanders</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Sanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-397</guid>
		<description>The GLS ES-57 is amazing guys.  I&#039;ve been using them for a few months now and I still can&#039;t believe it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GLS ES-57 is amazing guys.  I&#8217;ve been using them for a few months now and I still can&#8217;t believe it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Hey Evan,
I just grabbed all the mics I had at home, besides the pencil condensers. If I had any GOOD mics I surely would have compared them as well. I gotta deal with the crap at hand. :)

Don&#039;t you worry, I&#039;ll be doing more comparisons in the coming weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Evan,<br />
I just grabbed all the mics I had at home, besides the pencil condensers. If I had any GOOD mics I surely would have compared them as well. I gotta deal with the crap at hand. :)</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you worry, I&#8217;ll be doing more comparisons in the coming weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Another Mic Shootout &#124; ControlRoom - Mixin' it with Dr. J</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>Another Mic Shootout &#124; ControlRoom - Mixin' it with Dr. J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-395</guid>
		<description>[...] love equipment shootouts;  &#8211;especially when the underdog makes a great showing.  Today&#8217;s shootout comes from Audio Geek Zine where Jon has matched a GLS #S-57 against 2 Shure mics and an AT-2020.  I thought the S-57 did a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] love equipment shootouts;  &#8211;especially when the underdog makes a great showing.  Today&#8217;s shootout comes from Audio Geek Zine where Jon has matched a GLS #S-57 against 2 Shure mics and an AT-2020.  I thought the S-57 did a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 13:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-394</guid>
		<description>I like the rundown.  Still, this seems like an odd group of microphones to compare.  I couldn&#039;t find much good info on the ES-57, but the other 3 mics basically run the gamut.  I mean, compare the frequency responses &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zzounds.com/item--SHUPG52&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;for&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zzounds.com/item--SHUPG58&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;each&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zzounds.com/item--AUTAT2020&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mic&lt;/a&gt;.  One is a kick mic with little high-end response, one is a general purpose dynamic mic, and the other is a cheap condenser.  None of them are terrible mics, but each is designed to do something different from the others, and not much else.

I look forward to seeing your comparison to an SM-58.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the rundown.  Still, this seems like an odd group of microphones to compare.  I couldn&#8217;t find much good info on the ES-57, but the other 3 mics basically run the gamut.  I mean, compare the frequency responses <a href="http://www.zzounds.com/item--SHUPG52" rel="nofollow">for</a> <a href="http://www.zzounds.com/item--SHUPG58" rel="nofollow">each</a> <a href="http://www.zzounds.com/item--AUTAT2020" rel="nofollow">mic</a>.  One is a kick mic with little high-end response, one is a general purpose dynamic mic, and the other is a cheap condenser.  None of them are terrible mics, but each is designed to do something different from the others, and not much else.</p>
<p>I look forward to seeing your comparison to an SM-58.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Short links for April 15th, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Short links for April 15th, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] Cheap Mic Shootout #1 at Audio Geek Zine - A quick shootout with some budget mics: Shure PG-58, GLS Audio ES-57, Shure PG 52 &amp; Audio [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cheap Mic Shootout #1 at Audio Geek Zine &#8211; A quick shootout with some budget mics: Shure PG-58, GLS Audio ES-57, Shure PG 52 &amp; Audio [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: protman</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-387</link>
		<dc:creator>protman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-387</guid>
		<description>I recommend posting a spectrum analysis screenshot of each source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recommend posting a spectrum analysis screenshot of each source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-386</guid>
		<description>To me the AT-2020 sounds the closest to what I heard from the amp.

I don&#039;t have a 57!

I will do a bunch of tests don&#039;t worry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me the AT-2020 sounds the closest to what I heard from the amp.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a 57!</p>
<p>I will do a bunch of tests don&#8217;t worry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Yep. I agree, the gls es-57 sounds the best. Thanks for the test!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. I agree, the gls es-57 sounds the best. Thanks for the test!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Syd</title>
		<link>http://www.audiogeekzine.com/2008/04/cheap-mic-shootout-1/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Syd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.audiogeekzine.com/?p=430#comment-384</guid>
		<description>the es57 sounds the clearest, but where&#039;s the test against the real 57?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the es57 sounds the clearest, but where&#8217;s the test against the real 57?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
